'A Hard Days Night\r'

'Music is 1 of the Great Britains most marvelous contri andions to the world, nonwithstanding the tendency of practice of medicineal comedy movements over the make it four decades to spawn cultures that appear to virtuously damage the social norms, especially on the youth. Much of the phenomenon can be attributed to the advent and development of tele throw offing as a medium of discourse, for video recording receiver has vastly catapulted the calling of democratic role players to a whole parvenu level. In a similar magnitude, point has besides projected negative implications on how common people treat celebrities.\r\n together with video recording, flick has dehumanized celebrities in much(prenominal) a look that society and culture, especially in the west, pay eventually nurtured television viewers with mindless con sourity to the media as well as a full developed system of glorifying celebrities and their radical behavior. The tremors of stagger media and cinema have produced the concept of superficiality and prejudice as a primer coat for popularity. It is quite evident on how scene stars, melodyians, athletes, and commercialised models are treated in restaurants and other prevalent behinds.\r\nThe motion submit A ambitious Days Night, for instance, exemplifies and tackles the backlash of the demean nature of popularity as felt by celebrities in a personal level since they themselves feel the luxury of a principle life gradually departing from them. The context of the moving picture is inclined on the idea that the visual elements provided by cinema and television establish a following of a exceptional artist or group of artists establish on appearance and not on talent.\r\nIn analysis of the growing problem, Kevin Donnellys British Film Music and Musicals emphasizes the phenomenon of how A Hard Days Night became the antidote to the venom brought well-nigh by cinema and televisions visuals in such a way that the focus is much on The Beatles unison as the teller instead of the plot or the cast themselves (Donnelly, 2007). Contrary to other considers involving music artists such as the legendary Elvis Presley who has been the wop pig of scud makers who did nothing but to exploit his popularity in word picture.\r\nDonnelly writes that the film some connects viewers to the band by means of the musical comedy comedy score which goes glove in hand with the situation and emotions that the films scenes raise (2007). The songs suggest how the Beatles turn away about the fringe benefits of popularity piece dealings with the punishing nature of their duties such as recording and touring. The virtual contact also happens as the motion picture shares the bands brute(a) torments of having a celebrity life while sacrificing their personal goals and interests.\r\nThe visual technologies of cinema and film indeed contribute to the actuality that such mediums of communication make deities out of c elebrities. In this sense, A Hard Days Night represents and reflects the the star-making machinery around The Beatles in such a way that it documents of The Beatles misadventures in the United States during the peak of their go. The bands grasp with commercial success were represented through encounters of chase by law enforcers and a swarm of fans as well as their appearances on press conferences, endeavors with their agents, and hotel life (Balio, 1987).\r\nTherefore, Such hatful are quite similar to the shimmys of newfangled celebrities being sighted and chased on world places or being arrested for operate fast and under the influence of psychedelic substances. A Hard Days Night, meanwhile celebrates the bands stardom in a different manner, by highlighting the bands versatility as musicians since part of the film captures the bands current compositions at the time, being played during radiation pattern sessions, exist performances, and informal set-ups (Balio, 1987). \r\nThe films distinct draw close to the topic subjects the tendency of visuals such as film and television as career boosters in such a way that the showcase of the bands talent through live performances are shown, unlike traditional musician oriented films which make use of the artists preserve material. In a corresponding approach, A Hard Days Night together with the film and television industry serve as a mockery of the star-making machinery around The Beatles as well as other celebrities and popular personalities, primarily because music is an art form which stimulates appreciation through hearing.\r\nAs such, the devote medium of communication for expressing the art of music and recording artists is supposed to be the radio, not television, film, and definitely not print. The motion picture also insults the The Beatles as artists by humorously tackling the problem of pop fame, which the band members experience, through a medium that caused such a plague in the first place ( Glynn, 2005).\r\nIn addition, the polluting nature of television and cinema has once again made its mien felt as the visuals have proven to be useful aids in exploiting artists and promoting the developed system of idolizing celebrities, which is in this case happens to be The Beatles. Furthermore, the visuals provided by television and film entombs true musical talent by taking away the recording artists musical credibility (Frith, 2002). Simon Frith (2002) however implies that rock is to be understood as a television product.\r\nThe key elements and features of television and film, for Frith, have configured the manner of how the audience perceive music and musicians. Simon Frith writes that television has become largely creditworthy in the field of star-making for the reason that television with its emphasis on close-ups of the performer and musical virtuosity, particular types of staging and spectacle has added flavor to musicians as celebrated public figures (2002).\r\nFrith also adds that the emergeance of music networks such as Music picture together with several music think television programs such as fade of the Pops have also aided artists in terms of promotion which affects components of stardom such as record sales and chart ratings (Frith, 2002). The advent of technology has indeed influenced the the norms and standards for treatment of celebrities.\r\nVisuals, in an unimaginable, have added spice to musicians as attractions to the public eye, with it, the innovation of promotion for recording artists have revolutionized. Regardless if the careens brought about by the television and motion picture industry to the public status of career musicians have confirmative or negative undertones, the bottom-line still goes discomfit to a particular point, change. A change that has been felt almost half a century after it has long been innovated and practiced.\r\n'